[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Notes on scientifically comparative paleoposes

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Notes on scientifically comparative paleoposes
From: Dino Guy <dinoguy@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:57:44 -0700
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <60256.66.65.38.77.1300496158.squirrel@webmail.amnh.org>
References: <24566.1b96075d.3ab50996@aol.com> <4D83D867.5070707@easilink.com> <60256.66.65.38.77.1300496158.squirrel@webmail.amnh.org>
Reply-to: dinoguy@sbcglobal.net
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

If we take a look at Muybridge's ostrich locomotion series, at 
<www.flickr.com/photos/boston_public_library/4328168598/#/photos/boston_public_library/4328168598/lightbox/>
 , we can see 6 distinct poses from which to choose for illustrating running 
theropod skeleton profiles.  If we choose to respect Gregory S. Paul's wish 
that we not copy the pose he made famous, 5 alternative poses remain available 
to other paleoartists.  Would this satisfy everyone?

Follow-Ups:
- FW: Notes on scientifically comparative paleoposes
  - From: dale mcinnes <wdm1949@hotmail.com>

References:
- Re: Notes on scientifically comparative paleoposes
  - From: GSP1954@aol.com
- Re: Notes on scientifically comparative paleoposes
  - From: Dan Chure <danchure@easilink.com>
- Re: Notes on scientifically comparative paleoposes
  - From: "Jason Brougham" <jaseb@amnh.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Aussiedraco, new Australian pteranodontoid pterosaur
Next by Date: FW: Notes on scientifically comparative paleoposes
Previous by thread: Re: Notes on scientifically comparative paleoposes
Next by thread: FW: Notes on scientifically comparative paleoposes
Indexes: