[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy"
----- Original Message -----
> From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>
> To: keesey@gmail.com
> Cc: Dinosaur Mailing List <dinosaur@usc.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, 27 July 2011 4:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy"
>
> On 27 July 2011 18:34, Mike Keesey <keesey@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
> <tholtz@umd.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> An Archaeopteryx-like theropod from China and the origin of Avialae
>>>
>>> Xing Xu, Hailu You, Kai Du & Fenglu Han
>>> Nature 475, 465–470 (28 July 2011) doi:10.1038/nature10288
>>> Received 16 November 2010 Accepted 10 June 2011 Published online 27
> July 2011
>>>
>>> Archaeopteryx is widely accepted as being the most basal bird, and
>>> accordingly it is regarded as central to understanding avialan origins;
>>> however, recent discoveries of derived maniraptorans have weakened the
>>> avialan status of Archaeopteryx. Here we report a new
> Archaeopteryx-like
>>> theropod from China. This find further demonstrates that many features
>>> formerly regarded as being diagnostic of Avialae, including long and
>>> robust forelimbs, actually characterize the more inclusive group
> Paraves
>>> (composed of the avialans and the deinonychosaurs). Notably, adding the
>>> new taxon into a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis shifts
> Archaeopteryx
>>> to the Deinonychosauria. Despite only tentative statistical support,
> this
>>> result challenges the centrality of Archaeopteryx in the transition to
>>> birds. If this new phylogenetic hypothesis can be confirmed by further
>>> investigation, current assumptions regarding the avialan ancestral
>>> condition will need to be re-evaluated.
>>
>> Very cool!
>>
>> Yet another reason why the definition of "Aves" should not rest
> on
>> _Archaeopteryx_.
>
> Really?
>
> Wouldn't it have been AT LEAST equally cool to have reported this
> study under the headline Velociraptor Was A Bird?
>
> -- Mike.
+++++++++++++++++++++
ar) unmentioned part of this story is what happens to Aves.
Jason
>