[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
First titanosaur embryo from Asia
From: Ben Creisler
bh480@scn.org
First, apologies for glaring typos in my last two DML
postings that were sent off bit too hastily. In one the
subject line should have read "Cloverly
tyrannosauroid..." and in the other PaleoBios was spelled
without a capital B and a final ?s.? My bad.
Another new paper:
Gerald Grellet-Tinner, Cheul Muu Sim, Dong Hee Kim,
Patrick Trimby, Alessandra Higa, Seung Lak An, Hwa Suk
Oh, TaeJoo Kim and Nikolay Kardjilov (2011)
Description of the first lithostrotian titanosaur embryo
in ovo with Neutron characterization and implications for
lithostrotian Aptian migration and dispersion.
Gondwana Research (advance online publication)
doi:10.1016/j.gr.2011.02.007
Abstract
Although titanosaurs represent one of the most diverse
radiations of non-avian dinosaurs during the Cretaceous,
our knowledge of their early developmental stages was
restricted to the Auca Mahuevo (Argentina) embryos in
ovo. Here, we present the first complete lithostrotia
titanosaur embryo in ovo. The relatively small spherical
87.07 to 91.1 mm egg was discovered at the Lower
Cretaceous locality Algui Ulaan Tsav in Mongolia, and is,
to date, the smallest positively identified titanosaur
egg. Through taphonomic processes, the egg was
transformed into a calcite geode at the bottom of which
the embryonic bones settled down and are now partially
exposed on the lower egg surface. Neutron tomography
characterization reveals a fully developed embryo
fossilized within a thin (7.6 mm ~ 8.6 mm) calcite layer.
EBSD, a SEM-based diffraction technique, which measures
the complete crystallographic orientation of the crystal
lattice from a submicron area on the sample surface, is
used for the first time on an extinct dinosaur eggshell.
Observations of the egg and its embryo combined with
eggshell microcharacterizations suggest that this new
embryo was a lithostrotia titanosaur with an intermediate
robusticity index that shares a mosaic of skeletal
characters with Diamantinasaurus matildae from Queensland
(Australia) and the nemegtosaurid Rapetosaurus krausei
(Madagascar) more than with any other titanosaurs. The
Early Cretaceous age of Algui Ulaan Tsav implies that
this specimen greatly predates the previously described
lithostrotian titanosaurs from the Late Cretaceous
sediments of Mongolia. In addition, the recognized amount
of similar eggs that have been recovered during the last
70 years at Algui Ulaan Tsav suggests that a well-
established population of lithostrotian titanosaurs used
this site as a nesting site. The combined observations
provide an important addition to Mongolian fossil
richness and alter our understanding of the
paleodispersion of this sauropod group. It now appears
that lithostrotian sauropods would have reached Mongolia
during the Aptian-Albian, thus suggesting the existence
of a passage before the complete separation of the
Laurasian and Gondwanan continents. Possibly, the
lithostrotian north and eastward migration could have
occurred between North Africa, Spain, and the rest of
Europe prior to its fragmentation in large islands during
the Cretaceous, thus justifying the presence of
lithostrotians in the Cretaceous Romanian Hateg Island.
Research Highlights:
First and oldest articulated lithostrothian sauropod
embryo in a ~ 91 mm egg from Asia;
NT and EBSD characterizations and imaging of the Aptian-
Albian embryo and eggshell;
Northeastward lithostrothian migration from Africa
through Europe during the Aptian
Keywords: Lithostrotia; egg; embryo; Mongolia; Neutron
tomography; EBSD; lithostrotian paleodispersion
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?
_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B7XNB-52890RC-
1&_user=10&_coverDate=02%2F26%
2F2011&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=gateway&_origin=gateway&_so
rt=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVe
rsion=0&_userid=10&md5=0bb3e1acfcb8bd02c7c0239d94e4fd0e&se
archtype=a