[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Danger in the Gulf, Cretaceous-style...

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Danger in the Gulf, Cretaceous-style...
From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 08:23:55 +1000
Authentication-results: msg-ironport1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <49641.68.50.84.26.1274182647.squirrel@hockeyboys.umd.edu>
References: <49641.68.50.84.26.1274182647.squirrel@hockeyboys.umd.edu>
Reply-to: dannj@alphalink.com.au
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On Tue, May 18th, 2010 at 9:37 PM, "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@umd.edu> 
wrote:

> http://www.freep.com/article/20100513/BLOG24/100513001/1214/Blog24/Gulf-oil-spill

Am I the only one who finds the term "consensus paper" disturbing? Surely 
science is based first 
and foremost on evidence, rather than general agreement. 

-- 
_____________________________________________________________

Dann Pigdon
GIS Specialist                         Australian Dinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia               http://home.alphalink.com.au/~dannj
_____________________________________________________________

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Danger in the Gulf, Cretaceous-style...
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@umd.edu>

References:
- Danger in the Gulf, Cretaceous-style...
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@umd.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Flight capablities of Archie & Confucius? Not so good...
Next by Date: Eyecons
Previous by thread: Danger in the Gulf, Cretaceous-style...
Next by thread: Re: Danger in the Gulf, Cretaceous-style...
Indexes: