Re: DNA from old bird eggs

To: rtravsky@uwyo.edu
Subject: Re: DNA from old bird eggs
From: Dan Chure <danchure@easilink.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:32:08 -0700
Authentication-results: msg-ironport2.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.60.1003120823580.17205@frontier.uwyo.edu>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58L0.1003101021500.12612@zipcon.net> <Pine.GSO.4.60.1003120823580.17205@frontier.uwyo.edu>
Reply-to: danchure@easilink.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

No kidding.  I'd vote for that!

Dan

Richard W. Travsky wrote:


On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Ian Paulsen wrote:

HI ALL:
FYI:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100310/sc_afp/sciencepalaeontologyfossils

People speculate about cloning a dinosaur, but I think a 13 foot tallbird

would be more interesting...

References:
- DNA from old bird eggs
  - From: Ian Paulsen <birdbooker@zipcon.net>
- Re: DNA from old bird eggs
  - From: "Richard W. Travsky" <rtravsky@uwyo.edu>