RE: Pickering's nomina nuda (was RE: Rob Gay's print-on-demand publication of Kayentavenator elysiae

[Michael Erickson <tehdinomahn@live.com>]

> maybe "A. lydekkeri huenensis" ?

Wouldn't that imply a subspecies?
 
~ Michael
 

> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:11:41 +0000
> From: keenir@hotmail.com
> To: npharris@umich.edu; tijawi@yahoo.com
> CC: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: RE: Pickering's nomina nuda (was RE: Rob Gay's print-on-demand 
> publication of Kayentavenator elysiae
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------
>> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 22:00:01 -0400
> 
> quoting npharris@umich.edu
> 
> in Pickering's nomina nuda (was RE: Rob Gay's print-on-demand publication of 
> Kayentavenator elysiae
>>
>> Quoting Tim Williams :
>>
>>> Dann Pigdon wrote:
> 
> 
>>> He also named "Altispinax lydekkeri-huenensis" (Pickering, 1984). I
>>> don't even want to imagine what particular set of circumstances gave
>>> rise to *that* name...
>>
>> Well, maybe if Lydekker owns it, but originally found it on Huene's person...
>>
>> Also, of course, if the name were to be accepted, it would have to be
>> respelled without the hyphen as "A. lydekkerihuenensis". 
> 
> maybe "A. lydekkeri huenensis" ?
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3
>                                      
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1