My previous post was chewed up by the [SNIP] demon... here is the complete
paragraph:
"However, returning to Kayentavenator, if somebody attaches a different name to the same type specimen,
and Rob Gay asserts his name to be valid, then it will be an issue for the ICZN to decide. Until then, it
will be up to paleontologists to decide for themselves whether or not to acknowledge Kayentavenator as a
valid genus. As Dan puts it: "If Lulu Press is a valid outlet for nomenclatorial acts, then our lives
have become immensely simpler." I agree with Dan that it's perplexing that the description was not
simply re-submitted to a scientific journal, which would make Kayentavenator iron-clad from a nomenclatural
perspective. This "self-publication" route is a can of worms. In a perfect world, the ICZN would
shut down this loop-hole entirely."