[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Secondarily flightless birds or Cretaceous non-avian theropods?

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Secondarily flightless birds or Cretaceous non-avian theropods?
From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:30:51 +0200
Authentication-results: msg-ironport2.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <8b9d0ef50910192137x15673760w255496d074f18c69@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8b9d0ef50910192137x15673760w255496d074f18c69@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

> Kavanau, J. L. 2009. Secondarily flightless birds or Cretaceous
> non-avian theropods? Medical Hypotheses, in press.
> doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2009.09.015

Medical Hypotheses is a well-known pseudoscience journal. Judging from the 
abstract, this paper fits in there, despite not being about non-evidence-based 
medicine.

References:
- Secondarily flightless birds or Cretaceous non-avian theropods?
  - From: Nicholas Gardner <nick.gardner@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Giant Impact Near India - Does It Exist ???
Next by Date: Mycocephale
Previous by thread: Secondarily flightless birds or Cretaceous non-avian theropods?
Next by thread: RE: Komodo Kombat
Indexes: