[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: juvenile triceratops

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: juvenile triceratops
From: Amtoine Grant <rascienz@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:00:29 -0600
Authentication-results: msg-ironport1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58L0.0903241028160.6052@zipcon.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58L0.0903241028160.6052@zipcon.net>
Reply-to: rascienz@shaw.ca
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

"They have been found in enormous bone beds of multiple individuals, but all known Triceratops fossils up to now have been solitary individuals." Excuse my french, but...WTF?

On 24-Mar-09, at 11:28 AM, Ian Paulsen wrote:

HI:
 FYI:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20090324/sc_livescience/ gangofjuveniledinosaursdiscovered;_ylt=AhAed7kA0KbUM3LOfWN5KToPLBIF
--
Ian Paulsen
Bainbridge Island, WA, USA
" Which just goes to show that a
  passion for books is extremely unhealthy."
 from Cornelia Funke's "Inkheart".

Follow-Ups:
- RE: juvenile triceratops
  - From: Bruce Woollatt <brucewoollatt@hotmail.com>
- Re: juvenile triceratops
  - From: Erik Boehm <erikboehm07@yahoo.com>

References:
- juvenile triceratops
  - From: Ian Paulsen <birdbooker@zipcon.net>

Prev by Date: juvenile triceratops
Next by Date: RE: juvenile triceratops
Previous by thread: juvenile triceratops
Next by thread: RE: juvenile triceratops
Indexes: