[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: JVP 29(2) Spoiler Alert

To: "DML" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: JVP 29(2) Spoiler Alert
From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:07:13 +0200
Authentication-results: msg-ironport2.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
References: <600909.25121.qm@web30108.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1f4a892d0906171746p4705cc27v73462ea281341037@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Really, it's just unfortunate that the culture that came up with
biological nomenclature happened to revere a language with
inflectional grammar.

Sure, but this only addresses connecting vowels, gender and number agreement, and suchlike, not the root _mastic-_.

References:
- Re: JVP 29(2) Spoiler Alert
  - From: Tim Williams <tijawi@yahoo.com>
- Re: JVP 29(2) Spoiler Alert
  - From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: JVP 29(2) Spoiler Alert
Next by Date: Re: JVP 29(2) Spoiler Alert
Previous by thread: Re: JVP 29(2) Spoiler Alert
Next by thread: RE: JVP 29(2) Spoiler Alert
Indexes: