[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Unorthodoxies in Reptilian Phylogeny [Romer 1971]

To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Unorthodoxies in Reptilian Phylogeny [Romer 1971]
From: "Dawid Mazurek" <dawidmazurek@wp.pl>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:01:28 +0100
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
References: <34183.22785.qm@web83713.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <COL107-W396656CA950F91F4CE336FAC810@phx.gbl>,<4B30D194.2060200@gmx.at> <COL107-W33E229078D7E807B16B1D9AC810@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: dawidmazurek@wp.pl
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Not so long time ago I've read a 1925 article by Siemiradzki, a famousPolish paleontologist, at that time - unfortunatelly - enhanced by works ofFrench, Albert Gaudry. The paper was on the evolution of the vertebrates.Some of the most interesting statements: birds come from sauropods,doplhins - from ichthyosaurs, whales - mosasaurs, ungulates - ceratopsians,pholidotans - stegosaurians, glyptodonts - pareiasaurs, pterosaurs aremonotremates or marsupials. Vertebrates (fish) are polyphyletic, and comefrom different groups of arthropods (eurypterids, trilobites, Triops)!

I wonder how soon we will be laught.

DM

References:
- Unorthodoxies in Reptilian Phylogeny [Romer 1971]
  - From: David Peters <davidpeters@att.net>
- RE: Unorthodoxies in Reptilian Phylogeny [Romer 1971]
  - From: Michael Mortimer <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>
- Re: Unorthodoxies in Reptilian Phylogeny [Romer 1971]
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
- RE: Unorthodoxies in Reptilian Phylogeny [Romer 1971]
  - From: Michael Mortimer <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Additional material on the Sinornthosaurus venom report
Next by Date: Re: Additional material on the Sinornthosaurus venom report
Previous by thread: RE: Unorthodoxies in Reptilian Phylogeny [Romer 1971]
Next by thread: Re: Unorthodoxies in Reptilian Phylogeny [Romer 1971]
Indexes: