[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: more henpecking on 2008-beta WWD

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: more henpecking on 2008-beta WWD
From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:05:23 +1030
In-reply-to: <032420082052.1684.47E8147B000347720000069422216125569B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBFCE9C079D0A03030E08@att.net>
References: <032420082052.1684.47E8147B000347720000069422216125569B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBFCE9C079D0A03030E08@att.net>
Reply-to: dannj@alphalink.com.au
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

hammeris1@bellsouth.net writes:

So was there a particular reason why 'polar allosaur' was dropped in favor of a more general 'carnosaur' in this version?

'Polar Allosauroid' just doesn't have the same ring to it, and 'frigid Fukuiraptor' is a bit of a mouthfull.

___________________________________________________________________

Dann Pigdon
GIS / Archaeologist              http://geo_cities.com/dannsdinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia             http://heretichides.soffiles.com
___________________________________________________________________

References:
- more henpecking on 2008-beta WWD
  - From: hammeris1@bellsouth.net

Prev by Date: well darn
Next by Date: RE: well darn
Previous by thread: RE: more henpecking on 2008-beta WWD
Next by thread: New dinosaur in Mexico lured mates with giant horns
Indexes: