[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Rearranging the branches of the Tree of Life...

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Rearranging the branches of the Tree of Life...
From: Jamie Stearns <stearns5@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:47:09 -0500
References: <BLU115-W431AEFA7F71A56C26EE7E5B90C0@phx.gbl> <47D1E9F9.9000200@westserv.net.au>
Reply-to: stearns5@cox.net
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

I think the "third possibility" referred to was that sponges lost the tissues in a reversal and used to be more complex.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rearranging the branches of the Tree of Life...
  - From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>
- Re: Rearranging the branches of the Tree of Life...
  - From: tholtz@geol.umd.edu

References:
- Rearranging the branches of the Tree of Life...
  - From: GUY LEAHY <xrciseguy@q.com>
- Re: Rearranging the branches of the Tree of Life...
  - From: Colin McHenry <cmchenry@westserv.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Rearranging the branches of the Tree of Life...
Next by Date: The small, fossilised plant could change our view of the environment in which the Triassic dinosaurs lived
Previous by thread: Re: Rearranging the branches of the Tree of Life...
Next by thread: Re: Rearranging the branches of the Tree of Life...
Indexes: