----- Original Message ----- From: "Roberto Takata" <rmtakata@gmail.com>
To: "jrc" <jrccea@bellsouth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: Archie a non-flyer? (was:Re: origin of bats/reply 2 to TMK)
Not across the feather, but behind the feather.
You could test it with a paper sheet. Hold it horizontally with your fingertips at midline. Push the sheet through the air. The front middle will curl creating a turbulent airflow that cause the drag - you will feel the air resistance to the paper motion.
Then hold the paper more proximally to the front - say, half an inch to the front border. Now the paper will cut the air with less drag/resistance then before.
But, the flow is turbulent in both cases, both across and behind the wing. It's not laminar. You may be thinking about the difference between turbulent attached and turbulent seperated flow.
Actually, the camber does extend the critical angle of attack slightly, from
(By the way, many people say that the plane wing cross section shape create lift, but it is not true, it just reduces drag. What create lift is the angle of attack, if the shape of the wing was responsible for the lift, then planes could not fly upside down.)