[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Fossil reptiles mired in controversy
> >
And
yes,
I
have
had
ideas
stolen
from
me
and
published
by
>>
others.
One
was
stolen
from
a
conversation,
another
from
a
>>
manuscript
that
ended
up
rejected.
>Yikes!
When
did
that
happen?
What
was
the
paper?
>Is
this
stuff
widespread?
I think it's more common than we might like. However, scientific plagiarism can
be difficult to tell apart from two researchers simply coming to the same
conclusions from seeing the same (new) data.
D.
----------------------------------
Denver Fowler
df9465@yahoo.co.uk
http://www.denverfowler.com
Work:
http://www.museumoftherockies.org
Fieldwork pictures NM 2002-4 & China 06:
http://www.statemuseumpa.org/notes05.htm
http://www.wald.heim.at/urwald/540645/JH-Projekte/China_04-2006/chinaset.htm
TV Work:
http://www.impossiblepictures.co.uk
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A664661
Art:
http://dino.lm.com/artists/display.php?name=df9465
-----------------------------------
----- Original Message ----
From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>
To: Ken.Carpenter@dmns.org
Cc: twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com; dinosaur@usc.edu
Sent: Thursday, 31 January, 2008 11:38:17 AM
Subject: RE: Fossil reptiles mired in controversy
Ken.Carpenter@dmns.org
writes:
>
The
are
two
points
in
the
article:
the
allegation
of
possible
>
ethics
violation
backed-up
with
some
evidence
-
fine.
But
this
is
>
pumped
up
with
unsubstantiated
gossip
-
not
so
fine.
I
criticize
>
the
latter.
OK,
I
get
you.
_/|_
___________________________________________________________________
/o
)
\/
Mike
Taylor
<mike@indexdata.com>
http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\
"The
One-Page
Principle:
a
specification
that
will
not
fit
on
one
page
of
8.5x11
inch
paper
cannot
be
understood"
--
Mark
Ardis.
__________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com