Dann Pigdon wrote:
It depends on exactly what *Kryoryctes cadburyi* was. I've found at least
one phylogeny that places it within Tachyglossa:
http://www.fmnh.helsinki.fi/users/haaramo/metazoa/Deuterostoma/Chordata/Syna psida/Basal_Mammalia/Prototheria.htm
Little _Kryoryctes_ was certainly a digger (hence the name). But it's a stretch to say therefore it was a tachyglossan. BTW, I'm not saying that's what you're saying, Dann; but it may be the reason behind why that website classifies _Kryoryctes_ as a tachyglossan (albeit with a '?'). I think there's a _National Geographic_ article that also alludes to it being a Cretaceous echidna.
Dann Pigdon GIS / Archaeologist geo cities.com/dannsdinosaurs Melbourne, Australia heretichides.soffiles.com ___________________________________________________________________