[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: New Papers of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood



David Marjanovic wrote:

> Not for biogeographic purposes. One word: *Baryonyx*.

I agree that the _Baryonyx_-_Suchomimus_ link suggests a trans-Tethys 
dispersal.  But this might have been an isolated event.  Overall, the north 
African and European dinofaunas do not show a lot in common during the Early 
Cretaceous.  For example, it's not even close to the degree of similarity 
shared by the Morrison, Tendaguru, and Lourinha/Alcobaca faunas of the Late 
Jurassic.

> Maybe. But considering the age of that part of Dromaeosaurinae with
> "dromaeosaurine" teeth (Kimmeridgian), Unenlagiinae could easily be at least
> as old.

Yes, true.  But how confident are you in assigning dromaeosaurid teeth at the 
"subfamily" level?  :-)

Cheers

Tim

_________________________________________________________________
Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Café. Stop by 
today.
http://www.cafemessenger.com/info/info_sweetstuff2.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_OctWLtagline