[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: New Papers of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood
David Marjanovic wrote:
> Not for biogeographic purposes. One word: *Baryonyx*.
I agree that the _Baryonyx_-_Suchomimus_ link suggests a trans-Tethys
dispersal. But this might have been an isolated event. Overall, the north
African and European dinofaunas do not show a lot in common during the Early
Cretaceous. For example, it's not even close to the degree of similarity
shared by the Morrison, Tendaguru, and Lourinha/Alcobaca faunas of the Late
Jurassic.
> Maybe. But considering the age of that part of Dromaeosaurinae with
> "dromaeosaurine" teeth (Kimmeridgian), Unenlagiinae could easily be at least
> as old.
Yes, true. But how confident are you in assigning dromaeosaurid teeth at the
"subfamily" level? :-)
Cheers
Tim
_________________________________________________________________
Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Café. Stop by
today.
http://www.cafemessenger.com/info/info_sweetstuff2.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_OctWLtagline