[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Defining Ornithischia 2

To: Dinosaur Mailing List <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Defining Ornithischia 2
From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 13:57:04 -0700
In-reply-to: <BAY108-W3393DCF3D3F297231BD757D1AF0@phx.gbl>
References: <31575504.1191435188410.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hound.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Reply-to: keesey@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On 10/3/07, Anthony Docimo <keenir@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>  could it be that a clade could turn out to be paraphyletic?

No, but it could be a grouping (or taxon) that turns out not to be a clade.

-- 
Mike Keesey

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Defining Ornithischia 2
  - From: Anthony Docimo <keenir@hotmail.com>

References:
- re: Defining Ornithischia 2
  - From: david peters <davidrpeters@earthlink.net>
- RE: Defining Ornithischia 2
  - From: Anthony Docimo <keenir@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Charles R. Knight Bronze Triceratops
Next by Date: Re: Defining Ornithischia 2
Previous by thread: RE: Defining Ornithischia 2
Next by thread: RE: Defining Ornithischia 2
Indexes: