[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Suchosaurus, Baryonyx and Martinavis
> ERIC BUFFETAUT. 2007. The spinosaurid dinosaur Baryonyx (Saurischia,
> Theropoda) in the Early Cretaceous of Portugal. Geological Magazine,
> Published online by Cambridge University Press 11 Sep 2007
On a nomenclatural note, there does not seem to be any real prospect of
_Suchosaurus_ replacing the name _Baryonyx_, even
though _Suchosaurus_ was named first. First of all, the type species for
_Suchosaurus_ is _S. cultridens_, the type specimen of
which is a tooth (Wealden, Cuckfield, Sussex). The tooth is probably
baryonychine, and may even belong to _Baryonyx_
(Milner, 2003), but it is perhaps not diagnostic at the genus or species level.
(Then again, the same is true for _Troodon_ and
_Carcharodontosaurus_.)
Buffertaut's own opinion on this is: "_Suchosaurus_ could be regarded as a
senior synonym of _Baryonyx_. However, the type
specimen of _Suchosaurus cultridens_ has a strongly ribbed labial surface
whereas the teeth of the holotype of _Baryonyx
walkeri_ are smooth, or nearly completely so, labially, so that it cannot be
excluded that they belong to distinct taxa...
Moreover, as the type specimen of _Suchosaurus cultridens_ is a worn isolated
tooth, whereas _Baryonyx walkeri_ is based on
a large part of a skeleton, for practical purposes it seems advisable to go on
using the generic name _Baryonyx_ instead of
_Suchosaurus_."
Cheers
Tim
_________________________________________________________________
Discover the new Windows Vista
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=windows+vista&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE