[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Senter 2004 - Renesto and Binelli 2005 (very short)
Foreword: my computer keyboard is defective, so,
apologies in advance for any typo that will
escape my eye-checking of the e-mail.
I only wish to point out that the aim of Renesto
and Binelli (2005) was mainly the description of
Vallesaurus and secondarily to show how
even with Senter matrix (just a little updated
and corrected of some flaws) the nesting of
drepanosaurids within coelurosauravids was not
so well founded, and just a little integration
moved the whole group again within
Arcosauromorpha. The same may well apply to
Longisquama, but having not seen the specimen we
did not apply any correction to the data matrix
of Senter for that taxon, this is the only
reason why it was left where it was. I am also
pretty aware that our matrix (as well as
Senter's one) excludes too many taxa to be
consistent for a reliable phlylogeny of crown
group Diapsida. Or even of the Drepanosauridae.
When the preparation of another of these tiny
critters I have currently under study will be
completed (not too long to wait, I sincerely
hope) , perhaps I will have the chance to say
something more reliable and make a more extensive and in depth analysis.
Best,
Silvio
_
" Men take in great consideration what falls
within their sphere of knowledge, but they don't
realize how much it depends from what is beyond that""
(Zhuang Zhi)
Prof. Silvio Renesto
Department of Structural and Functional Biology
Università degli Studi dell' Insubria
via Dunant 3, 21100 Varese
Italy
phone +39-0332-421560
e-mail: silvio.renesto@uninsubria.it
see my Triassic website at http://dipbsf.uninsubria.it/paleo/
see my outdoor-nature photography website at
http://wendigo.altervista.org