[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: No Cretaceous placental mammals?



On 6/22/07, Dino Guy Ralph <dinoguy@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Jeff Hecht writes:
"It is curious that living birds seem to have originated well before the
K/T, in contrast to mammals."

If you'll forgive the Linnaean vernacular, I think that Jeff Hecht meant to
say something along these lines:
"It is curious that extant orders of birds seem to have originated well
before the K/T, in contrast to extant orders of mammals."

That's even less curious than my interpretation (that he meant "placentals" instead of "mammals"), since it's essentially meaningless. "Order" doesn't have a good definition, but, when it comes to birds and mammals, you almost could define it as "any of certain clades originating in the early Cenozoic or Late Cretaceous".

--
Mike Keesey