Re: late night thoughts: misunderstand neck?

[Anthony Docimo <keenir@hotmail.com>]

> For a guaranteed-fatal single bite the rex would have to bite *really* 
> close to the head. I'm guessing sauropods would rather keep their heads 
> away from large predators if at all possible, so they'd be doing everything 
> in their power to avoid such an encounter. And their 'power' would have 
> been considerable.

I think the biggest danger to a megapredator feeding on sauropods (by 
attacking the neck) is getting blinded by all the blood.

(after all, the blood needs a lot of pressure to shoot up to the head, no 
matter what the neck angle is)



> What trees? What evidence is there that sauropods lived *amongst* trees? I 
> think it's more likely they spent more time in open terrain at forest 
> borders (for those that actually fed on trees) than cruising amongst them. 
> Sauropods with low-slung heads (like diplodocids) needn't  have gone 
> anywhere near trees at all. Those long necks and tails would have made 
> navigating amongst trees a nightmare.

isn't it a moot point?:  what trees existed back then?  certainly not the 
branch-rich trees descended from the flowering plants.

_________________________________________________________________
Get a preview of Live Earth, the hottest event this summer - only on MSN 
http://liveearth.msn.com?source=msntaglineliveearthhm