[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dead Men Don't Wear New Papers

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Dead Men Don't Wear New Papers
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:17:35 +0200
References: <3893.16966.qm@web52910.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

So there _were_ sauropodomorphs with a gastric mill... ~:-|

"The apparent scarcity of prosauropods in Upper Triassic strata of the Newark Supergroup is interpreted as an artifact of ecological partitioning, created by the habitat range and dietary preferences of phytosaurs and by the preservational biases at that time within the lithofacies of the Newark Supergroup basins."

Phytosaurs? Probably not, but what was meant? Sauropodomorphs or aetosaurs?

References:
- Re: Dead Men Don't Wear New Papers
  - From: Jura <pristichampsus@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Carnegie Diplodocus
Next by Date: Re: Feather Flap
Previous by thread: Re: Dead Men Don't Wear New Papers
Next by thread: RE: Dead Men Don't Wear New Papers
Indexes: