[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Feather Flap
"Nevertheless, certain maniraptorans do show some traits that might be
associated with arboreality - or at least scansoriality. There's small body
size, for one (yeah, I know this one's a stretch). There's possible
scansorial/arboreal traits in the manus and pes, including (for example) an
enlarged hallux that has shifted distally on the foot compared to other
theropods. Still not a reversed hallux, just a longer and lower one."
Which brings up the question of what characteristics we actually associate with
arboreality in birds (and/or near-bird theropods). The reversed, gripping
hallux is obviously a distinctive characteristic when it appears, but I don't
think we should be overly reliant on that character (it is also worth pointing
out that a reversed hallux does not always indicate arboreal habits: the animal
could also be secondarily terrestrial, as in roadrunners).
For one thing, the theropods in question may have been able to climb somewhat
quadrapedally. That changes the mechanics of climbing enough that the
correlation between arboreal habits and hallux morphology may be looser than we
expect. In addition, while tight gripping of branches is quite helpful and
important for modern arboreal birds, I am not convinced that it is required for
an arboreal existence (especially in animals with powered flight or extensive
gliding ability).
One set of characters of note in the regard are actually structural characters:
extant arboreal birds (including modern passerines and falconimorphs, for
example) seem to fall within a similar range for certain quantitative,
structural characters associated with limb loading. The most likely
explanation is evasive flight in forested settings (and more specifically, the
resulting accelerations and momentum changes), but that's still tentative. Any
other discrete qualitative or quantitative characters that are highly
correlated with arboreality in avian lineages (other than food morphology)?
Cheers,
--Mike H.