[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Hone and Benton 2007 (their second paper)

To: twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Hone and Benton 2007 (their second paper)
From: jrc <jrccea@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:53:08 -0600
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
References: <BAY143-F39ECAC74130652F762188A98210@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: jrccea@bellsouth.net
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Williams" <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com> To: <dinosaur@usc.edu> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 7:05 PM Subject: Re: Hone and Benton 2007 (their second paper)

I wasn't actually advocating the idea that _Archaeopteryx_ climbed trees like a goat. No way Jose. All I was doing was underscoring how vague and potentially misleading the word "arboreal" can be. The term really has to be put into a context in order for it to be meaningful.

Right on, Tim. JimC

References:
- Re: Hone and Benton 2007 (their second paper)
  - From: Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Hone and Benton 2007 (their second paper)
Next by Date: Fw: Feather Flap
Previous by thread: Re: Hone and Benton 2007 (their second paper)
Next by thread: Re: Hone and Benton 2007 (their second paper)
Indexes: