[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Fear and New Papers in Las Vegas
Another new batch o' stuff! First, the straight-up dinosaurs:
Ye, Y., Peng, G.-Z., and Jiang, S. 2007. Preliminary histological study on
the long bones of Middle Jurassic Shunosaurus and Omeisaurus from Dashanpu,
Zigong, Sichuan. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 46(1):135-144.
Lindgren, J., Currie, P.J., Siverson, M., Rees, J., Cederström, P., and
Lindgren, F. 2007. The first neoceratopsian dinosaur remains from Europe.
Palaeontology 50(4):929-937. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00690.x.
ABSTRACT: Shallow marine, nearshore strata of earliest Campanian
(Gonioteuthis granulataquadrata belemnite Zone) and latest Early Campanian
(informal Belemnellocamax mammillatus belemnite zone) age in the
Kristianstad Basin, southern Sweden, have yielded isolated leptoceratopsid
teeth and vertebrae, representing the first record of horned dinosaurs from
Europe. The new leptoceratopsid occurrence may support a European dispersal
route for the Leptoceratopsidae, or may represent an entirely endemic
population. The presence of leptoceratopsid teeth in shallow marine deposits
contradicts previous hypotheses suggesting that basal neoceratopsians mainly
preferred arid and/or semi-arid habitats far from coastal areas.
Then, from the "I wish I was a dinosaur" category (joke!):
Brochu, C.A. 2007. Systematics and taxonomy of Eocene tomistomine
crocodylians from Britain and northern Europe. Palaeontology 50(4):917-928.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00679.x.
ABSTRACT: The holotype of Dollosuchus dixoni (Owen) from the Early-Middle
Eocene Bracklesham Beds of England is a set of mandibular fragments that
cannot be distinguished from corresponding parts of other longirostrine
crocodylians. An isolated humerus from the Bracklesham Beds is consistent
with a gavialoid, but it cannot be referred to the holotype of D. dixoni.
The name Dollosuchoides densmorei is established for the well-preserved
skull and skeleton of a tomistomine from the Middle Eocene of Belgium that
had been referred to D. dixoni. It can be clearly distinguished from the
basal tomistomine 'Crocodilus' spenceri Buckland from the Lower Eocene of
England, which cannot be referred to Dollosuchoides and is provisionally
referred to Kentisuchus Mook. Although basal within Tomistominae,
Dollosuchoides is more closely related to Tomistoma than to Kentisuchus.
Lastly, from the "here's how to do paleontology properly" camp:
Peterson, K.J., Summons, R.E., and Donoghue, P.C.J. 2007. Molecular
palaeobiology. Palaeontology 50(4):775-809. doi:
10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00692.x.
ABSTRACT: For more than a generation, molecular biology has been used to
approach palaeontological problems, and yet only recently have attempts been
made to integrate research utilizing the geological and genomic records in
uncovering evolutionary history. We codify this approach as Molecular
Palaeobiology for which we provide a synthetic framework for studying the
interplay among genotype, phenotype and the environment, within the context
of deep time. We provide examples of existing studies where molecular and
morphological data have been integrated to provide novel insights within
each of these variables, and an account of a case study where each variable
has been tackled to understand better a single macroevolutionary event: the
diversification of metazoan phyla. We show that the promise of this approach
extends well beyond research into the evolutionary history of animals and,
in particular, we single out plant evolution as the single greatest
opportunity waiting to be exploited by molecular palaeobiology. Although
most of our examples consider how novel molecular data and techniques have
breathed new life into long-standing palaeontological controversies, we
argue that this asymmetry in the balance of molecular and morphological
evidence is an artefact of the relative 'newness' of molecular data. In
particular, palaeontological data provide unique and crucial roles in
unravelling evolutionary history given that extinct taxa reveal patterns of
character evolution invisible to molecular biology. Finally, we argue that
palaeobiologists, rather than molecular biologists, are best placed to
exploit the opportunity afforded by molecular palaeobiology, though this
will require incorporating the techniques and approaches of molecular
biology into their skill-set.
Donoghue, P.C.J., and Benton, M.J. 2007. Rocks and clocks: calibrating the
Tree of Life using fossils and molecules. Trends in Ecology and Evolution
22(8):424-431. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.05.005.
ABSTRACT: A great tradition in macroevolution and systematics has been the
ritual squabbling between palaeontologists and molecular biologists. But,
because both sides were talking past each other, they could never agree.
Practitioners in both fields should play to their strengths and work
together: palaeontologists can provide minimum constraints on branching
points in the Tree of Life with considerable precision, and estimate the
extent of unrecorded prehistory. Molecular tree analysts have remarkable
modelling tools in their armoury to convert multiple minimum age constraints
into meaningful dated trees. As we discuss here, work should now focus on
establishing reasonable, dated trees that satisfy rigorous assessment of the
available fossils and careful consideration of molecular tree methods: rocks
and clocks together are an unbeatable combination. Reliably dated trees
provide, for the first time, the opportunity to explore wider questions in
macroevolution.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jerry D. Harris
Director of Paleontology
Dixie State College
Science Building
225 South 700 East
St. George, UT 84770 USA
Phone: (435) 652-7758
Fax: (435) 656-4022
E-mail: jharris@dixie.edu
and dinogami@gmail.com
http://cactus.dixie.edu/jharris/
STORIES IN SIX WORDS OR LESS:
"Machine. Unexpectedly, I'd invented
a time"
-- Alan Moore
"Easy. Just touch the match to"
-- Ursula K. Le Guin
"Batman Sues Batsignal: Demands
Trademark Royalties."
-- Cory Doctorow