Re: [...] Archaeopteryx 10

[Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com>]

Jaime Headden wrote:

>   Confusion in the literature, regardless of an interpretation of lack of 
> such
> ambiguity, required not one, but TWO acts of suppression by the ICZN 
> separated
> by 30 years due to a fortuitious find in Holland.

Yes, _Pterodactylus crassipes_, which was named before _Archaeopteryx 
lithographica_, and is referrable to it (at least at the genus level).

Cheers, Tim

_________________________________________________________________
Turn searches into helpful donations. Make your search count. 
http://click4thecause.live.com/search/charity/default.aspx?source=hmemtagline_donation&FORM=WLMTAG