David Marjanovic wrote:
If we hold Livezey and Zusi's analysis to the same standards as huge molecular analyses in regards to support (say 95% bootstrap liklihood)
That's too strict. Bootstrap is well known to produce too low support values, just like how Bayesian posterior probabilities are generally too high (they always tend to be 100 % even for rather obvious cases of long-branch attraction -- Zhang et al. 2005 Systematic Biology).
That's another case of convergence, I bet. Adding *Palaeotis* and *Diogenornis* should be interesting.
|--Pygopodo-tubinares
It goes without saying that the ICZN mandates the deletion of the hyphen.
What this says to me is that the relationships of major neoavian taxa may be
forever beyond morphological resolution if only recent taxa are included.
You could well be right.
Fossils are the morphologist's only hope at combating such detailed convergence.
We know how Mayr will spend the rest of this year... :-)
The Messel birds could be very helpful, yes.
Cheers
Tim
From predictions to trailers, check out the MSN Entertainment Guide to theAcademy Awards® http://movies.msn.com/movies/oscars2007/?icid=ncoscartagline1