[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Pterosaur diversity (was: Re: Waimanu)

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Pterosaur diversity (was: Re: Waimanu)
From: Michael Habib <mhabib5@jhmi.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 20:33:43 -0400
In-reply-to: <00d601c68443$81cd52b0$0300a8c0@IPC>
Reply-to: mhabib5@jhmi.edu
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

I didn't do that, I did a phylogenetically independent contrasts analysis in Mesquite which takes the phylogeny into account, branch lengths included.

Excellent, I was going to ask about that. I am curious, however, how much phylogenetic signal there is in your dataset for the different clades. Is significance high across the board?

Cheers,

--Mike Habib

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pterosaur diversity (was: Re: Waimanu)
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

References:
- Re: Pterosaur diversity (was: Re: Waimanu)
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: *Dalianraptor cuhe* and *Sinornithosaurus haoianus* (short!)
Next by Date: Re: Pterosaur diversity (was: Re: Waimanu)
Previous by thread: Re: Pterosaur diversity (was: Re: Waimanu)
Next by thread: Re: Pterosaur diversity (was: Re: Waimanu)
Indexes: