[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Galveosaurus vs Galvesaurus
On Tue, 16 May 2006 14:07:24 -0500 Tim Williams
<twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com> writes:
> Williams, T. (2005) Galveosaurus herreroi, new sauropod from the
> Late
> Jurassic of Spain.
> Archives of the dinosaur mailing list, Fri, 19 Aug 2005, The
> Claveland [sic]
> Museum of Natural
> History Museum. Available from:
> http://dml.cmnh.org/2005Aug/msg00301.html
> (23/01/2006).
>
> Williams, T. (2005) Dino Genera & Species List 2005 (was Re: New
> versiton of
> Dinosaur Encyclopaedia). Archives of the dinosaur mailing list,
> Fri, 16 Dec
> 2005, The Claveland Museum of
> Natural History Museum. Available from:
> http://dml.cmnh.org/2005Dec/msg00274.html (23/
> 01/2006).
We know just enough to be dangerous! ;-)
I don't even read my posts from '95. Way too embarrassing. It's good
that we *don't* put out CDs of our greatest hits.
The Web-based journal _Palaeontologia Electronica_ is only an increment
more "publish-y" than us. It disseminates CDs of its Web-based issues to
libraries and other interested people. But AFAIK, _Palaeontologia
Electronica_ does not qualify as a medium for naming new taxa by the ICZN
rules.
All things considered, ICZN's rule is a good one. If the DML started
naming dinosaurs, we could do some real damage! ;-)
<pb>
--
One of the National Security Agency's Top 10 favorite phone taps