[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: More on the baby Triceratops

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: RE: More on the baby Triceratops
From: "Richard W. Travsky" <rtravsky@uwyo.edu>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:15:00 -0700 (MST)
In-reply-to: <20060309002030.M95030@alphalink.com.au>
References: <FE61C18C399DB54B856C6924BED83789974DCF@dmns-exch1.museum.dmns.org> <20060309002030.M95030@alphalink.com.au>
Reply-to: rtravsky@uwyo.edu
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 dannj@alphalink.com.au wrote:

On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 09:30:26 -0700, Ken.Carpenter wrote
No parental attention required. If we look at dinosaur trackways, the
smallest footprints are HALF adult size, implying segregation of adults
and juveniles.
Or some sort of marsuplal-like pouch. :)


Ouch, considering little horns in the case of baby trikes...

[...]

Follow-Ups:
- RE: More on the baby Triceratops
  - From: dannj@alphalink.com.au

References:
- RE: More on the baby Triceratops
  - From: Ken.Carpenter@dmns.org
- RE: More on the baby Triceratops
  - From: dannj@alphalink.com.au

Prev by Date: Re: Integument. . . extant vx extinct
Next by Date: Short Papers from 2005
Previous by thread: RE: More on the baby Triceratops
Next by thread: RE: More on the baby Triceratops
Indexes: