[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: More on the baby Triceratops

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: More on the baby Triceratops
From: "Richard W. Travsky" <rtravsky@uwyo.edu>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 09:18:31 -0700 (MST)
In-reply-to: <20060307162654.3a6i15vvgg0owkwk@web.mail.umich.edu>
References: <20060307205238.67960.qmail@web82201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060307162654.3a6i15vvgg0owkwk@web.mail.umich.edu>
Reply-to: rtravsky@uwyo.edu
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Nick Pharris wrote:

Quoting Guy Leahy <xrciseguy@sbcglobal.net>:
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2006/03/06_triceratops.shtml
Interesting that the baby, at a year old, is still very much in the "cute" stage. Does this suggest fairly protracted parental attention? What say ye?


I also wonder how small they were at birth.

Even at 1 year old there's no way their tiny legs could've kept up with adults; that implies, I think, some degree of parental attention.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: More on the baby Triceratops
  - From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>
- Re: More on the baby Triceratops
  - From: Graydon <oak@uniserve.com>

References:
- More on the baby Triceratops
  - From: Guy Leahy <xrciseguy@sbcglobal.net>
- Re: More on the baby Triceratops
  - From: Nick Pharris <npharris@umich.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: More on the baby Triceratops
Next by Date: RE: Photos from the Field Museum Exhibit "Evolving Planet"
Previous by thread: Re: More on the baby Triceratops
Next by thread: Re: More on the baby Triceratops
Indexes: