[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

I don't think this made it onto the list: Androgynous Rex

To: DINOSAUR@usc.edu
Subject: I don't think this made it onto the list: Androgynous Rex
From: bucketfoot-al@justice.com
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:18:54 +0000 (America/Los_Angeles)
Cc: DINOSAUR@usc.edu
Reply-to: bucketfoot-al@justice.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

So I guess this means we go back to observing that
there appear to be a gracile and a more robust version
of TRex, and then we flip a coin as to which is male
and which is female?

(How come I have never heard this kind of speculation
about the Triceratops, or any other dinosaur besides
TRex anyhow?)  

_________________________________________________
FindLaw - Free Case Law, Jobs, Library, Community
http://www.FindLaw.com
Get your FREE @JUSTICE.COM email!
http://mail.Justice.com

Follow-Ups:
- RE: I don't think this made it onto the list: Androgynous Rex
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@geol.umd.edu>

Prev by Date: Papers on pterosaur and _Sharovipteryx_ wings
Next by Date: Re: was ... Jaime. Now: M. Baeker has a problem with phylogenetic analysis
Previous by thread: Re: I don't think this made it onto the list: Androgynous Rex
Next by thread: RE: I don't think this made it onto the list: Androgynous Rex
Indexes: