Re: Hanson 2006, Mortimer, Baeker response

[Matthew Burton-Kelly <matthew.burton.kelly@und.nodak.edu>]

Posted by David Peters
> Just as I have tested this cladogram in every way possible, this is a 
> challenge to others to let it get published and/or test it yourself. 
> I'm not so much bragging about this cladogram as I am challenging any 
> worker to knock it down with evidence so it can be changed for the 
> better. Can you do it? I'm hoping you can. If there is a mistake here, 
> I want to know about it.

Probably the best reason I've ever heard for publication.  Forthcoming 
and unselfish.

MBK

-----------------------------
Matthew Burton-Kelly
Graduate Student
Department of Geology and Geological Engineering
University of North Dakota
(802) 922-3696
matthew.burton.kelly@und.nodak.edu
http://uweb.und.nodak.edu/~matthew.burton.kelly/
--------------------------------------------
"About thirty years ago there was much talk that geologists ought only 
to observe and not theorize; and I well remember someone saying that at 
this rate a man might as well go into a gravelpit and count the pebbles 
and describe the colors.  How odd it is that anyone should not see that 
all observation must be for or against some view if it is to be of any 
service!"
-Charles Darwin, in an 1861 letter to Henry Fawcett.
On 12 Jun, 2006, at 6:05 AM, David Peters wrote: