[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: "World record" progression in dinosaur size



On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 20:08:51 +0000, Michael Mortimer wrote
> I don't get exactly what this list is for.  Shouldn't the theropod 
> list stop at 1915 for example?
> 

'Size' isn't necessarily overall length; a heavier animal with a shorter 
length may be considered 'bigger' in some fashion.

Did anyone ever try to estimate the total length of Spinosaurus in 1915, and 
if so, what was the estimate at the time? It's only with hindsight (and 
better preserved close relatives) that we know what the spinosaur body plan 
was like.

> >From: Vladimír  Socha <Seismosaurus@seznam.cz>
> >Reply-To: Vladimír  Socha <Seismosaurus@seznam.cz>
> >To: dinosaur@usc.edu
> >Subject: "World record" progression in dinosaur size
> >Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:03:38 +0200 (CEST)
> >
> >Good day,
> >the list below would be my personal idea (any comment appreciated):
> >(years of description, not discovery of the species)
> >
> >1824 - Megalosaurus (bucklandii) (9 meters, 3 tonnes)
> >
> >1825 - Iguanodon (anglicus) (9 m., 3-4 t.)
> >
> >1841 - Cetiosaurus medius (18 m., 27 t.)
> >
> >1877 - Apatosaurus ajax (25 m., 30 t.)
> >
> >1878 - Amphicoelias fragillimus (?)
> >
> >           - Diplodocus longus (27 m., 15? t.)
> >
> >1903 - Brachiosaurus altithorax (25 m., 30? t.)
> >
> >1914 - Brachiosaurus brancai (25 m., 40-60 t.)
> >
> >1985 - Supersaurus vivianae (30-40? m., 60? t.)
> >
> >1993 - Argentinosaurus huinculensis (35 m., 70-90 t.)
> >
> >2000 - Sauroposeidon proteles (30 m. (height 18 m.), 60 t.)
> >
> >....
> >
> >As for the theropod dinosaurs:
> >
> >1824 - Megalosaurus bucklandi (9 m., 3 t.)
> >
> >1877 - Allosaurus fragilis (12 m., 4 t.)
> >
> >1905 - Tyrannosaurus rex (12.8 m., 6.5 t.) "C-rex" 13.6 m.?
> >
> >1915 - Spinosaurus aegypticus (17 m.?, 12-19 t.?)
> >
> >1995 - Giganotosaurus carolinii (12.5 - 14 m., 8 t.)
> >
> >2006 - Mapusaurus roseae (14 m.?, 8+ t.)
> >
> >Ceratosaurus ingens? Saurophaganax maximus? Epanterias amplexus? ...
> >
> >Thank you for any corrections, comments etc. Vlad
> >
> >
> >


--
___________________________________________________________________

Dann Pigdon
GIS / Archaeologist         http://heretichides.soffiles.com
Melbourne, Australia        http://www.geocities.com/dannsdinosaurs
___________________________________________________________________