[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: DINOSAUR digest 3454

To: rtravsky@uwyo.edu, dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: DINOSAUR digest 3454
From: Patrick Norton <ptnorton@suscom-maine.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:48:12 -0500
References: <20060121033958.80328.qmail@web34710.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <001e01c61eb1$258cb1a0$6e9e05cf@pc>
Reply-to: ptnorton@suscom-maine.net
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

Richard Travsky wrote:

Well, a large arc anyway. Depends on how flexible that neck is.>

Agreed. But, in principle, and based on published estimates of flex angles of sauropod necks, it makes sense. I'd like to see someone do an analysis of this.

PTN

References:
- Re: DINOSAUR digest 3454
  - From: goosezilla <goosezilla@yahoo.com>
- Re: DINOSAUR digest 3454
  - From: Patrick Norton <ptnorton@suscom-maine.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Sauropod ONP...and energetics
Next by Date: Re: Sauropod ONP...and energetics
Previous by thread: Re: DINOSAUR digest 3454
Next by thread: teratorn relationships
Indexes: