[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: parthenogenetically derived reptile offspring

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: parthenogenetically derived reptile offspring
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:29:19 +0100
References: <02FF224E-47E2-4B19-BAC1-549273F9E93A@blissnet.com>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

None the less, this is applicable to this list.

I don't quite think so -- it tells us more about squamates, but nothing whatsoever about dinosaurs.

Whenever you see the word "reptiles", complain immediately -- and loud.

References:
- parthenogenetically derived reptile offspring
  - From: "franklin e. bliss" <frank@blissnet.com>

Prev by Date: Re: parthenogenetically derived reptile offspring
Next by Date: RE: parthenogenetically derived reptile offspring
Previous by thread: Re: parthenogenetically derived reptile offspring
Next by thread: RE: parthenogenetically derived reptile offspring
Indexes: