[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Precision, Ultra-, Super-, Seismo- and the like

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: RE: Precision, Ultra-, Super-, Seismo- and the like
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:41:04 +0100
In-reply-to: <BAY101-F61095F69750B0DBB94FA698DE0@phx.gbl>
References: <BAY101-F61095F69750B0DBB94FA698DE0@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

> _Supersaurus_ (named 1985) has
> priority over _Ultrasauros_ (named 1991) in the event of synonymy.

Oh. Yes, of course.

> The fact that _Dystylosaurus_ was sunk into _Supersaurus_ (rather
> than vice versa) is a subjective decision.  However, given that
> _Supersaurus_ was described from a partial skeleton, and
> _Dystylosaurus_ from a solitary vertebra, this
> decision makes perfect sense on taxonomic grounds.

Agreed.
-- 
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! 
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer

References:
- RE: Precision, Ultra-, Super-, Seismo- and the like
  - From: Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Precision, Ultra-, Super-, Seismo- and the like
Next by Date: Re: Precision
Previous by thread: Re: Precision, Ultra-, Super-, Seismo- and the like
Next by thread: RE: Precision, Ultra-, Super-, Seismo- and the like
Indexes: