Re: Arambourgiania citation

[Rob Taylor <rjtaylor68@comcast.net>]

Mike Hanson wrote:

> What is the citation for the paper in which the genus _Arambourgiania_ was
> first published as a replacement for the preoccupied _Titanopteryx_? I
> have seen three different citations floating around, one that I have a
> copy of does not contain any mention of this name, and I have some doubts
> on the existence

I've searched far and wide for a valid reference for Nessov & Borkin '89, 
cited at a number of online resources, but to no avail. (In fact, it's been 
on my to-do list to write you about it.) Several subsequent papers on 
_Arambourgiania_ 
(http://www.pterosaur.co.uk/species/UCP/Azhd/Arambourg-philadelphia.htm), 
but unfortunately I've not gotten my hands on any of them. Have always 
wondered whether they contain a reference or clues.

If a paper does indeed exist and you ultimately track it down, I'd very much 
appreciate a heads-up. (Of course I'd do likewise.)

Best,

Rob Taylor
rjtaylor68@comcast.net
The Dinosaur & Pterosaur Database