[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:15:03 -0700
In-reply-to: <003201c6cc7c$5d273760$7f4efea9@gericom>
References: <20060830213013.68838.qmail@web50805.mail.yahoo.com> <003201c6cc7c$5d273760$7f4efea9@gericom>
Reply-to: keesey@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On 8/30/06, David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at> wrote:

> but I will draw the line at "Kentucky Fried Dinosaur"...
How is "chicken" in any way incorrect? Chickens aren't paraphyletic.


"Kentucky Fried Gallus" would be better. ;)
--
T. Michael Keesey
The Dinosauricon: http://dino.lm.com
Parry & Carney: http://parryandcarney.com

References:
- Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
  - From: don ohmes <d_ohmes@yahoo.com>
- Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
Next by Date: Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
Previous by thread: Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
Next by thread: Re: Strange thoughts on PN - was Re: BAD vs. BADD
Indexes: