[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: BAD vs. BADD (was: Re: Most popular/common dinosaur misconceptions)



After all, Linnaeus was a creationist

Maybe not so.

"There is overwhelming evidence that Linneaus did not
believe in fixity of species."

It's a bit complicated.

I'll start with the observation that L. rejected the early evolutionary theory by Buffon. (Not that it was worth much, AFAIK...)

L. believed that the genera (literal meaning: something along the line of "clans") had been created, while species (literally: "views") could arise by hybridization of other species of the same genus. (In plants, at least, he suggested several concrete examples.) This went so far that to him extinction was impossible -- if a species would die out, it could always arise anew, in identical form, by hybridization of two others.

Systema Naturae has a religious hymn every few pages.

That said, the good man was pretty far ahead of his time in other respects. Remember that he called the chimpanzee (erm... including the orang-utan) *Homo troglodytes*. In a private letter he even wrote he should have fused this genus with *Simia* (all monkeys) because there were no "genus-level differences", but this, he wrote, would have led to an even bigger uproar. Now keep in mind that T. H. Huxley put us into Kingdom Psychozoa over 100 years later.