[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Protopenguins and pterosaurs



Nick Pharris nailed the flaw. IF you assert first that penguins and storks diverged at 62 Ma, OF COURSE you end with the conclusion that there were Cretaceous penguins, and other neornithine lineages. And that gets you into all sorts of wild speculation. For example, I didn't know until I read their paper that the decline of small pterosaurs in the late Cretaceous was because they were eaten by raptors (and I don't mean velociraptors, I mean Falconiformes!!!). No matter that we don't have a single Cretaceous falconiform in the fossil record. But read the paper for yourself: it is alleged to be open-access.

mbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/msj124v1

I hope Euan Fordyce is squirming with embarrassment at what his co- authors have written above his name!!

Cheers

Richard Cowen