[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Protopenguins and pterosaurs
Nick Pharris nailed the flaw. IF you assert first that penguins and
storks diverged at 62 Ma, OF COURSE you end with the conclusion that
there were Cretaceous penguins, and other neornithine lineages. And
that gets you into all sorts of wild speculation. For example, I
didn't know until I read their paper that the decline of small
pterosaurs in the late Cretaceous was because they were eaten by
raptors (and I don't mean velociraptors, I mean Falconiformes!!!). No
matter that we don't have a single Cretaceous falconiform in the
fossil record. But read the paper for yourself: it is alleged to be
open-access.
mbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/msj124v1
I hope Euan Fordyce is squirming with embarrassment at what his co-
authors have written above his name!!
Cheers
Richard Cowen