[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Tyrannosaur stuff
Another interesting question in regards to this topic
is how long it took tyrannosauroids to become
"big-ass" after the end-Cenomanian extinction of
carcharodontosaurids/spinosaurids. Did the early Late
Cretaceous faunas (Turonian-Coniacian) in NA, for
example, contain any "big-ass" predators, and if so,
were they tyrannosauroids?? Perhaps there were some
"big-ass" Turonian dromaeosaurs? :-)
Guy Leahy
--- Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> T. Michael Keesey wrote:
>
> >I'm not sure where the cut-off between
> "small-bodied" and "big-ass" is,
>
> :-) Let's go for an arbitrary cut-off of 4-5m.
> Above that is 'big-ass".
>
> >but _Alectrosaurus olseni_, _Alioramus remotus_,
> and _Dryptosaurus
> >aquilunguis_ were smaller than any tyrannosaurines,
>
> There is a school of thought that _Alioramus
> remotus_ is based on an
> immature specimen, and so some of its
> 'autapomorphies' may be related to
> ontogeny. It could be a bona fide tyrannosaurine.
> _Dryptosaurus
> aquilunguis_ is estimated to be have been a little
> over 6m long, based on
> the type material (which appears to come from an
> adult individual). (The
> type material for _Appalachiosaurus_ indicates an
> animal around the same
> size as the _Dryptosaurus_ type specimen, but the
> former was immature when
> it died.) I'm not sure about the maxium dimensions
> of _Alectrosaurus
> olseni_, given that the hypodigm for this species
> requires revision. In any
> case, all these guys were much larger than _Dilong_
> (1.6m; type) and
> _Aviatyrannis_ (ilium only 90mm long) and
> significantly larger than
> _Stokesosaurus_ and _Tanycolagreus_ (both maybe 4m
> in body length).
> _Eotyrannus_, with an estimated body length of 4-5m,
> falls in the middle of
> the "small-bodied" and "big-ass" categories. :-)
>
> >and not terribly larger than EK tyrannosauroids.
>
> Some of the less well known theropod taxa from the
> EK may turn out to be
> tyrannosauroids - like the rather large (but perhaps
> not "big-ass")
> _"Chilantaisaurus" maortuensis_.
>
> Cheers
>
> Tim
>
>
>