[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Burpee Conference

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: RE: Burpee Conference
From: Guy Leahy <xrciseguy@prodigy.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: tholtz@umd.edu, Ken.Carpenter@dmns.org
In-reply-to: <NDBBIAJHGJBHMGNKDFAHGEIHLBAA.tholtz@geol.umd.edu>
Reply-to: xrciseguy@prodigy.net
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

I also found the Burpee conference very interesting
and enjoyable.  Before the conference, I was leaning
towards the "Nanotyrannus is a T. rex" hypothesis, but
after the conference I have lept back on the fence as
to whether Nanotyrannus is a juvenile T. rex or a
juvenile of something else.  The braincase study
presented by Dr. Witmer addressing this issue was well
done, and certainly looks at this topic from a novel
perspective.  I'm looking forward to seeing more from
Dr. Witmer's group on this subject.

Guy Leahy

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Burpee Conference
  - From: Dino Sniffer <dinosniffer@hotmail.com>

References:
- RE: Burpee Conference (LONG)
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@geol.umd.edu>

Prev by Date: Fw: Jurassic Foundation in jeopardy
Next by Date: RE: Burpee Conference
Previous by thread: RE: Burpee Conference (LONG)
Next by thread: RE: Burpee Conference
Indexes: