[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Correction: RE: Cladistic definitions of Dinosauria, Saurischia, Sauropodomorpha

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Correction: RE: Cladistic definitions of Dinosauria, Saurischia, Sauropodomorpha
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 00:59:02 +0200
References: <NDBBIAJHGJBHMGNKDFAHOEGBLBAA.tholtz@geol.umd.edu>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

For the record, that definition is TECHNICALLY "Weishampel in Holtz & Osmolska", as neither I nor Halzka actually wrote that text!!

Does this explain the discrepancy between the cladogram (where Carnosauria is an impressive polytomy) and the text (which resolves most of that polytomy)...?

References:
- Correction: RE: Cladistic definitions of Dinosauria, Saurischia, Sauropodomorpha
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@geol.umd.edu>

Prev by Date: PhyloCode was Re: Cladistic definitions of Dinosauria, Saurischia, Sauropodomorpha
Next by Date: Re: Cladistic definitions of Dinosauria, Saurischia, Sauropodomorpha
Previous by thread: Correction: RE: Cladistic definitions of Dinosauria, Saurischia, Sauropodomorpha
Next by thread: Re: Cladistic definitions of Dinosauria, Saurischia, Sauropodomorpha
Indexes: