[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: sauropods: homotherm,heterotherm or gigantotherm?

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: sauropods: homotherm,heterotherm or gigantotherm?
From: Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:49:29 -0500
In-reply-to: <007a01c5b97d$438075f0$2802aa50@gericom>
Reply-to: twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu


David Marjanovic

Same for pareiasaurs. (Plus, those may have been amphibious.)
So this thing was averaging a tonne of
growth per year, or nearly 3 kg per day.
GAH!
That proves it. They must have broken the secret on how to evolve cellulase.


The microbes in their tum-tums probably broke the secret for them.

Cheers

Tim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: sauropods: homotherm,heterotherm or gigantotherm?
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

References:
- Re: sauropods: homotherm,heterotherm or gigantotherm?
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: New sauropod paper
Next by Date: Re: New sauropod paper
Previous by thread: Re: sauropods: homotherm,heterotherm or gigantotherm?
Next by thread: Re: sauropods: homotherm,heterotherm or gigantotherm?
Indexes: