[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
New in Cladistics
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.00048.x
Pickett, K. M. 2005. The new and improved PhyloCode, now with types,
ranks, and even polyphyly: a conference report from the First
International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting. _Cladistics_ 21(1):
[posted online before print, no page numbers]
(doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.00048.x)
Abstract:
"A report from the first International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
is presented. The meeting revealed that the PhyloCode, once
implemented,
will itself not require adherence to the three major tenets of
philosophy that proponents have claimed required its creation. These
include the abandonment of (1) non-monophyletic taxa, (2) ranks, and
(3)
types."
--
Debruyne, R. 2005. A case study of apparent conflict between molecular
phylogenies: the interrelationships of African elephants. _Cladistics_
21(1): [posted online before print, no page numbers]
(doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.00044.x)
Abstract:
"Recent molecular phylogenies of the African elephants suggest that
there
is an evolutionary structure within *Loxodonta africana*. Some nuclear
results (Roca et al., 2001) support the separation of the forest
African
elephant subspecies *L. a. cyclotis* as a species distinct from the
savannah elephant *L. a. africana*, on the basis of the recognition of
both forming highly divergent (reciprocally monophyletic) clades.
Conversely, a mitochondrial survey (Eggert et al., 2002), while
admitting a geographic partitioning of the genetic structure within
African elephants, suggests retaining the status quo. They recognize
three diagnosible entities (western, central and south-eastern Africa)
with non-overlapping ranges within *L. africana* _sensu lato_. In order
to address these conflicting views (historical fragmentation and
speciation or isolation by distance, respectively), we have sequenced
two datasets of 1961 bp (for 50 elephants) and about 3700 bp,
respectively (for 20 elephants) of the mitochondrial DNA for both forms
of elephants (*cyclotis* and *africana*). They span the cytochrome _b_
gene, the control region and several RNAs. When compared with former
mtDNA data, they provide the most comprehensive view of the African
elephant phylogeny (78 mtDNA haplotypes, of which 44 are new) and
provide the first insight into populations from the Democratic Republic
of Congo. The genetic diversity of mtDNA was appraised and the
stability
of alternative phylogenetic trees was investigated. Our results are
inconsistent with both those prior studies. They revealed two highly
divergent molecular clades referred to as F and S, that do not conform
to the morphological delineations of cyclotis and africana. A
non-negligible proportion of specimens of *L. a. africana* display
haplotypes prevailing in forest elephant populations (clade F). The
geographic distribution of clades and areas of their co-occurrence
support the hypothesis of incomplete isolation between forest and
savannah African elephant populations, followed by recurrent
interbreeding between the two forms. We state that the conclusions of
prior studies resulted from insufficient character and/or geographic
sampling. We conclude that there is no satisfying argument which can
recognize two or more species of African elephants. We briefly comment
on the meaning of such an attitude in a conservation viewpoint."
Cheers,
Jaime A. Headden
Little steps are often the hardest to take. We are too used to making leaps
in the face of adversity, that a simple skip is so hard to do. We should all
learn to walk soft, walk small, see the world around us rather than zoom by it.
"Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969)
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/