[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Fastovsky vs Archibald

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Fastovsky vs Archibald
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:01:45 +0200
References: <20050620135049.77844.qmail@web80408.mail.yahoo.com> <020e01c575a3$87d6fda0$0100a8c0@yourynxza5usuu>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

http://www.nersc.no/MACESIZ/Papers/fas05.pdf .

Wow! It says the _entire_ Hell Creek Fm was deposited in a transgressive setting (and within just 1.4 Ma)! The irony... the irony... :-)

References:
- Re: Fastovsky vs Archibald
  - From: GUY LEAHY <xrciseguy@prodigy.net>
- Re: Fastovsky vs Archibald
  - From: K and T Dykes <ktdykes@arcor.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Suspicious impact craters and iridium layers?
Next by Date: Re: Fastovsky vs Archibald
Previous by thread: Re: Fastovsky vs Archibald
Next by thread: Re: Fastovsky vs Archibald
Indexes: