Re: Suspicious impact craters and iridium layers?

[David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>]

>  Wroblewski disputed even that, based on work in WY.

Interesting. When? How old is his paper?

> Btw evidence recently mentioned onlist for a WIS which
> was not closed at the end may support his view.

It merely says the extent of the regression wasn't as large as we used to 
believe.