[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Fastovsky vs Archibald
In the "Butting Heads" section of the recent Natural History magazine,
David Fastovsky and David Archibald debate the K/T extinction.
I quote Fastovsky: " ...every published, quantitative, field-based,
stratigraphically refined study addressing this question has concluded
that dinosaur diversity was unchanged up to the K/T boundary"
and Archibald: "In the last 10 million years of the Cretaceous, but
well before the K/T boundary events, the most recent compilations show an
unequivocal decline in the diversity of dinosaur species."
Hard to see how both of these statements can co-exist. Unfortunately,
there was only one reference cited between both articles.