[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Fastovsky vs Archibald



In the "Butting Heads" section of the recent Natural History magazine, David Fastovsky and David Archibald debate the K/T extinction.

I quote Fastovsky: " ...every published, quantitative, field-based, stratigraphically refined study addressing this question has concluded that dinosaur diversity was unchanged up to the K/T boundary"

and Archibald: "In the last 10 million years of the Cretaceous, but well before the K/T boundary events, the most recent compilations show an unequivocal decline in the diversity of dinosaur species."

Hard to see how both of these statements can co-exist. Unfortunately, there was only one reference cited between both articles.